Fachjournal zieht Séralini-Studie zurück: internationale Pressestimmen

Siehe auch
Martin Ballaschk: "Wenn die Kontrollmechanismen der Wissenschaft versagen" - http://blog.naturkundemuseum-berlin.de/genfood-wenn-die-kontrollmechanismen-der-wissenschaft-versagen/ und ders.: "Endlich! Séralinis Genfood-Sensation wandert in die Tonne" - http://www.scilogs.de/detritus/seralini-retraction/

Christina Berndt:  "Fachjournal zieht Veröffentlichung zu Genmais und Ratten zurück" - http://www.sueddeutsche.de/wissen/streit-um-gentechnik-fachjournal-zieht-veroeffentlichung-zu-genmais-und-ratten-zurueck-1.1831247
John Entine: "Séralini Threatens Lawsuit In Wake Of Retraction Of Infamous GMO Cancer Rat Study" -  http://www.forbes.com/sites/jonentine/2013/11/29/notorious-seralini-gmo-cancer-rat-study-retracted-ugly-legal-battle-looms/

Steven Novella: "The Seralini GMO Study - Retraction and Response to Critics" - http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/the-seralini-gmo-study-retraction-and-response-to-critics/
ORF: "Umstrittene Studie zurückgezogen" - http://science.orf.at/stories/1729129/

Katherine Rich: "How could Séralini's GM study have made suckers of so many people?" - http://www.foodnavigator-asia.com/Policy/How-could-Seralini-s-GM-study-have-made-suckers-of-so-many-people?utm
John Timmer: "Anti-GMO crop paper to be forcibly retracted" - http://arstechnica.com/science/2013/12/anti-gmo-crop-paper-to-be-forcibly-retracted/

John Vidal: "FSA 'endangering public health' by ignoring concerns over GM food" - http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2013/sep/05/gm-food-cancers-fsa